 |
PHARMACEUTICAL/LIFE SCIENCES INDUSTRY :
Laboratory Efficiency Improvement/Training Program |
|
| |
Client: |
|
A
rapidly expanding global generic pharmaceutical firm with U.S. operations. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Problem: |
|
Rapid
growth and the expansion of the firm's targeted generic introductions
placed a significant strain on the R&D laboratory operation leading
to increased errors and lower overall productivity. Faced with tight
timelines, an increased project workload, and concern about resultant
delays in filing ANDAs, the senior management of this facility asked
Tunnell Consulting to assess the current status, staffing, and capabilities
of the laboratory and to recommend how best to optimize throughput
and efficiency while reducing errors. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Approach: |
|
Selected interviews were conducted with a cross-section of the R&D
laboratory staff in combination with process assessments and documentation
reviews to support a rapid but thorough evaluation of the laboratory
operation that focused on:
·
Quality of the current lab training program and practices
·
Overall competency of analysts (relative strengths/weaknesses)
·
Changing roles/responsibilities of the supervisory,
senior scientific, and analytical staff
·
Identification of 'bottlenecks' and opportunities for
simplification in lab processes/procedures
·
Modes and effectiveness of communications
·
Selection and use of metrics
An implementation plan was subsequently developed that recommended
several key opportunities for improvement, including:
·
Expanding and standardizing the lab training program
(basic and advanced technical skills, cGMP/documentation training,
training and qualification of lab trainers, etc.)
·
Developing a formalized mentoring/continuing learning
and technical support program for analysts
·
Introduction of metrics
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Results: |
|
Working
in partnership with the R&D staff, Tunnell developed a more thorough/robust
R&D lab training program that resulted in a significant increase
in competency, self-confidence, increased compliance, and a reduction
in errors. This, coupled with the introduction of more effective metrics
and better defined roles and responsibilities, resulted in more than
a 30% increase in throughput/productivity. Bottom-line savings to
the company was projected to be $ 2.1 million/year. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|